Category Archives: Social Observation

Theories of the Looks Obsession: pondering the perfection quest equilibrium

“Mirror Mirror on the wall,

Who’s the fairest of them all?”

– The Queen from Snow White and the seven dwarfs

It’s still a bit of a stigma to confess that we care so much about looks though most of us so clearly do. How do I know it’s a stigma? Because in any dating app, in the ‘what am I looking for’ section, men and women will detail out all these noble qualities like: intelligence, someone caring, kind, passionate, funny, and the worst “laughs at my jokes” (um, I’ll laugh without you telling me to if they’re actually funny, thank you very much), and I have yet to come across a profile that says the most important thing that people are looking for: ‘someone good-looking’.

The truth is most of us don’t even consider a date, let alone a future with someone who doesn’t meet our appearance bar. We are constantly rejecting people romantically even before a ‘hello’ just based on how they look. I’m not judging anyone here – I’ve rejected plenty of people due to appearance. It’s a safe assumption to say I’ve been rejected plenty of times because of appearance. It’s part of the equilibrium.

In this blog-post, I consider a few different theories on why we are so obsessed with looks. I consider factors above and beyond the obvious scientifically supported reason that beauty is often a function of features like symmetry and clear skin, which are health indicators (though I don’t really get why acne or big pores would be particularly unhealthy…). We want to procreate with the healthiest and so there is an innate biological preference for beauty. However, there are plenty of beautiful people who have and get diseases/conditions, and plenty of ordinary-looking people who are functionally healthy. And why highlights are an attractive hair-look can’t be explained by evolutionary preferences — so there are some cultural and social factors at play here too, which is more the focus of this post.

Theory 1: Media and the exposure to more beauty

(Disclaimer: This theory is borrowed from a friend)

In the olden days, whenever those were, you had 30-50 data points of people from your village to go by when defining attractiveness. The hottest person in your town was a 10, and you’d be very happy marrying this person.

Now, positioned in the bigger world they would be a 7.5, may be?

We are constantly exposed to more attractive people on TV who are selected out of huge populations. The curve of your expectations is grotesquely modified, and the mere mortals you come across every day just don’t impress you any more.

newsnachor2
Even your news about all the terrible things happening locally and in the world is delivered by glamorous goddesses

Theory 2: Social media culture 

Social media has likely increased the emphasis on looks. Photos are no longer just for your family album and to be looked at at family gatherings by an intimate group of people, but are out there on the internet for your huge network to see. Naturally, the more people that see something, the better you want it to look. It’s the difference between if the only people who visited your house were a few relatives and if your house was open to public visits all the time even by casual acquaintances. You’d want to furnish and maintain your house much more stylishly for the second case.

socialmedia.jpg
“From deceptive selfie angles that make average-looking people appear attractive, to curating your Facebook feed so it looks like you’re having more fun than you actually are, social media has taken neoliberalism’s self-centered mantra and pumped it full of cocaine-laced steroids” – Highsnobiety.com  — https://www.highsnobiety.com/2017/03/14/social-media-narcissism/

In addition to the pressure for looking good yourself, social media photo sharing has put more pressure on my generation to find visually attractive partners who will make that coastline landscape from your holiday look even more stunning with them in front.

It’s a tall order, I find sunglasses help 🙂

Theory 3: A craving for joy and beauty

Perhaps we crave beauty and attractiveness because we lack it in other areas of our life?  Beauty brings joy. Perhaps we lack joy in other areas of our lives and so we flock to beautiful people because we’re so hungry for joy. Think of the modern office worker – working 9 am to 7 pm (and often even longer hours in professional services). For many people, work and other life admin  (bills, appointments, investments, family issues etc) consume so much of their time and energy that life becomes drudgery. And then in strolls a beautiful girl or guy into the office and suddenly life is worth living. There is romantic promise! There is beauty! There is joy!

I wonder then if a craving for beauty in a person can be reduced by having more beauty in other forms in your life? I personally have wanted to become less shallow in my preferences in a partner, but can’t figure out how to value aesthetics less.

Theory 4: First-world satiation – Beauty begets more beauty 

Running a somewhat opposing logic to theory 3, this theory posits that we crave more beauty because we already have more beauty. When you are surrounded by beautiful material goods or landscapes, you need a beautiful person to complete the lifestyle you were going for. The fewer problems we have in life, the more we work on perfecting and fine-tuning the little things.

This remains to be tested: Is the looks obsession more among higher income people vs lower income people who might value other traits like how hard-working someone is?

Theory 5: Because everyone else holds it in high esteem

The thing about people is we are such sheep. Herd behavior is ingrained in us so deep. If enough people believe something, it becomes true enough to be taken seriously unfortunately. That’s the premise of money. That’s the premise of the countless lies told in political campaigns, and that’s partly the premise of so-called universal standards of beauty.

The most memorable example I have is when I was in high school and a girl was referred to as ‘the prettiest girl in the school’. I hadn’t come across this girl so I was curious to see who she was. One day, my friend pointed her out. “Oh…her?!” I was surprised. I’d seen that girl several times before and had even thought of her as looking a bit like a witch. Wow, beauty is subjective, I thought. But with everyone else heralding her as beautiful, I had to adjust my views a bit for societal consonance.

This bit I will shed some judgment on: I think it’s sad how the diversity in opinion of beauty is being lost with the loudest and most powerful voices shoving their version of what’s beautiful in everyone’s faces and minds. All of us are being brought in line to their narrow definitions, which tentatively span race now since the world woke up a bit, but in very narrow ways.

Is the obsession free or trivial? 

First of all, there’s the whole beauty industry, estimated $445 Bn by Forbes. then there is the massive amounts of time we spend on manicures, hair coloring even before your hair has gone grey,  cosmetic surgery, Botox etc. etc.

But beyond the obvious costs…

At the risk of over-sharing (one of my key traits!), I’ll detail a personal anecdote. A couple of months ago, I went on probably one of the best dates I’ve ever been on. The guy was kind, a great listener, engaging, and most rare of all, someone who had a genuine drive and vision to make the world a better place. He was a true leader. Someone who wouldn’t just take the trash out and go to dinner parties with you, but someone you could actually look up to and be proud of. He picked up the bill for dinner despite me insisting. He walked me back home without wanting anything in return. He texted me saying it was lovely to meet. What made his behavior all the more praiseworthy was I think he knew we wouldn’t see each other again, but he still cared enough to make the date a good experience. The missing ingredient from my side (don’t know about his) was a lack of aesthetic agreement or physical chemistry. If him and I looked different, I suspect the outcome could have been different. Perhaps this is all unfixable…

A number of my guy-friends still frustratingly deny why things don’t work out with certain girls, or why they are with certain girls. They’ll talk about personality, when the issue is often looks: being with a girl who is unreasonably demanding because she’s attractive, or rejecting a girl because she doesn’t meet their physical criteria. Well and good, we all have freedom. But wouldn’t it be good if we were all more aware of why we make decisions, and why we favor people over others.

I love it when my girl-friends are honest about this when I try and set them up with someone, which leads me to my next point….

Baby, if you demand it from me, I’ll demand it from you: Girls also care

It’s important to note how much girls care about guys’ looks – which some guys who are still living in old-world heaven don’t realize. This isn’t the 1950s – a good job and mediocre ability to hold a normal conversation aren’t going to cut it for the best girls out there. There are so many men I’ve come across who think they are God’s gift to women despite having mediocre looks and mediocre personalities.

fakemirror.jpg
Guys who think they are God’s gift to women – I guess this is what they’re seeing, when we’re seeing them for what they are

Women, on the whole, seem to need more confidence in their looks. And men, need to be more realistic about themselves and therefore their expectations of their partner.


Closing thoughts

As I have grown older, I have realized we can’t change or fight equilibria, we can only observe them. And there is a certain tranquility and intellectual satisfaction in careful observation, and in articulating the truth. A few things to ponder as you head for your next beauty trip…whether you’ll find it in a person or a hike!

 

Advertisements

Serial dating: an epidemiological analysis

About a month ago, I went on a date with a guy who was smart, interesting, ambitious, health-conscious, athletic, curious, passionate about environmental issues, and pretty damn good-looking.  The Venn diagram of our interests and passions would have had a decent chunk of overlap.

After one and a half hours of drinking in a bar, we walked out and proceeded never to contact each other again.

What are we looking for?

This has happened multiple times now. You meet for a coffee, have a great conversation about artificial intelligence, politics, homelessness in San Francisco. And you never see each other again. Occasionally, the romance lasts for a couple of weeks or a month. But ultimately it fizzles out like potassium being dropped in water.

In this blog-post, I explore 4 categories of reasons that I believe drive our serial dating behavior.


I. There is a diminished need or want for sole companionship

In the day and age of TaskRabbit, Uber, food delivery services and online everything, the need for another human being to share the workload of living with has come down significantly. I don’t practically feel the need most days to have anyone to split errands with (though except for maybe doing taxes, because I haven’t cracked that one myself yet…).

In more primitive times and societies, marriage is partly a mechanism for living, which had a high task burden. Today, the task burden is significantly alleviated by all the apps and devices we have. In more traditional societies, the need for marriage also came from a strict division of labor and skills, which meant women needed men for certain tasks and men needed women for certain tasks. Today, no man needs a wife to cook for him. No woman needs a man to drive her anywhere.

Having eliminated this need, we venture into the wants category to see what desires may remain that could be fulfilled by a partner. The truth is even wants have been significantly diminished.

“Do you ever feel lonely?” I asked one of my dates.

“Not really” he replied “I have a roommate and tons of friends to go hiking and skiing with on weekends, and a busy job through the week”.

It sounded familiar, because it was my lifestyle too (minus skiing, I don’t ski…yet).

The San Francisco (and other big city) lifestyle is one of extended teenage-hood. You live with roommates well into your 30s. Here’s the catch for those of you wanting me to reflect on how sad it is:  it isn’t sad at all – it’s actually fun. It’s fun to alternate who you hang out with every weekend, to have stimulating conversations with tons of different people, exposure to tons of different activities, and all this with zero commitment to doing anything for anyone that may benefit them at your inconvenience.

But here’s the catch…living without love nearby is like living without insurance, it’s great until something bad happens. And with enough health and luck, something bad may never happen in our 20s or 30s or 40s, and there really may be no need for someone beyond your parents, siblings and select friends. Your risk aversion drives how much you search for a partner. In my experience, the boldest/most optimistic among us don’t crave partnership as much.

 II. We like being alone and the freedom it brings

“I like spending the day by myself” – anon girl-friendFreedom

For many of us, the truth is having the freedom to shape your non-work days the way you want has become a norm. Especially since during the week most of us are corporate slaves, the weekend is when we get to exercise our freedom. Deviations from this freedom norm are painful. And any kind of relationship will tend to involve some compromise on your freedom.

You also might be the type of person who is happy watching a movie by yourself; reading a book by yourself; going to a museum by yourself with the freedom to linger over any exhibit for as long as you like. I’ve typically been the type of person who constantly needs to be with someone, but a month or so ago I went to watch Jumanji on a Saturday night by myself, and had a great time. Who knew?

III. We know what we want, we won’t budge on it, and we can’t find it 

I think this is the most pertinent reason for most of us being serial daters.

“I know exactly what I want and you’re not it” said one of my dates to me once. (Gotta admire his honesty at least!)

After a certain age and certain number of dates and partners, many of us know what we want in vague terms, if not exactly. Though, I also believe many of us will discover that what we thought was critical wasn’t so important because we’ll be charmed/trapped (half glass full/half glass empty, take your pick of words) by some other variable.

It’s good to know what you want, but it’s probably a barrier to your love life to want too much, and want more than you can give yourself.

What are you expecting from your future partner? And is it really fair given what you will bring to the table yourself?

Perhaps we’ve taken optimization too far in our love lives. Perhaps we need to follow the wise words of Baloo the bear from The Jungle Book…

“And don’t spend your time lookin’ around
For something you want that can’t be found
When you find out you can live without it
And go along not thinkin’ about it
I’ll tell you something true

The bare necessities of life will come to you”

— Baloo

IV. We are waiting for fireworks: about these ‘sparks’ you speak of

I recently asked one of my dates (the first guy in this post actually!) for feedback. Interestingly, feedback in the dating field is extremely taboo. So let me dwell on that point a bit.

Pros of getting feedback:

  • You might learn something useful that is either fixable (e.g. “talked too much”, “dressed too casual”) or just an insight on how you are perceived. We all have blind spots.
  • They might say really nice things about you and then you get to feel a warm glow (he did!)
  • You are probably never going to see that person again so the downside is small

Cons of getting feedback:

  • You might hear something that could lower your self-esteem, and it could be unfixable e.g. “You’re too short” (probably common feedback for me, if anyone was ever honest!)
  • They might not be honest/might be too vague
  • Their feedback might be their unique perspective/preference and not widely applicable
  • They might think you have low self-esteem/ liked them too much – and everyone who is dating knows, there’s no worse humiliation than someone knowing that you like them when they don’t like you 

Ok, detour on feedback over. I took the risk. The guy said “blah blah blah blah <nice things> blah blah blah…..Unfortunately I just didn’t feel a strong connection and never pursued further”

It made me think: a lot of us are walking into dates expecting some kind of supernatural connection or force between us, and won’t text back without it. I’ve done it too: not pursued people because of a lack of ‘Je ne sais quoi’.

When you look at relationships and how they started, I have heard a few stories of sparks happening (usually of ‘friends of friends’). I’ve also heard tons of stories where there was no connection or spark, but an affection between two people grew over time. Have I had a spark with anyone I met straightaway? Being candid, no. I did used to find guys instantly attractive and sometimes I still do, but it’s always the guys who every girl finds attractive because they’re visually attractive men  – so it’s not a spark exclusive to me or us.

I’m left questioning: Are we right to want a ‘spark’? What exactly is this elusive ‘spark’ of which people speak?


Concluding thoughts

So where are we left with all forces seemingly pulling us away from the currents of love that also run deep in our psyche? For once, my friends, I have to say, I don’t have the answer. I just don’t know. But I hypothesize: May be serial dating isn’t all that bad as long as you know when to compromise. May be there is someone out there who is worth the glorious sacrifice of not going on a Saturday hike with friends. May be there is someone out there who won’t satisfy all your criteria, but you will accept them because you will never satisfy anyone’s criteria fully either, and someone will accept you.

And ultimately, like anything in life, Love is a gamble too. So for now, Happy Serial dating, keep at those frogs!

 

prince frog

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fairy-tales and myths part II: The shackles of Gender

In this blogpost, I tackle the biggest myth of all: the myth of freedom, and expose the reality of shackles that we live in.

The delusion of “Freedom”

Sometimes I feel like I might have an underlying Tourette syndrome-type problem. Especially when I’m bored stiff in a meeting or group interaction, I toy with the idea of saying something crazy, to shake people up, see how they would react. But so far at least, I haven’t said it.

The point is we are all in shackles. There is no free speech. There’s not even fully free thought. No one has full freedom. When I think of the word “freedom”, I think of America. A century of slogans of liberty, life, pursuit of happiness has brainwashed everyone. And the opposite of freedom makes me think of countries where you can’t wear whatever, do whatever. But the reality is no one is really free, not even the people you think are free are free.

Wait, why are you writing about freedom? Don’t you blog about dating? 
What inspired this post was a glass of wine, and a copy of Men’s health which was left in my hotel room at the W (I guess they thought I was a guy?).  Also, I haven’t been on a date in six months (wah wah) so can’t really write about dating any more.


The shackles of men

I wonder what men read I thought as I enthusiastically started to flick through Men’s health…

Most boring magazine ever.

This particular one didn’t even have an article on sex. The articles were mostly about exercise, and full of serious, slightly angry looking men. The color scheme was strictly masculine (read: strictly boring) and the fonts very straight-edged, harsh.

This is masculine culture as the world has defined it: harsh, straight-edged, lacking warmth, tenderness, joy, appreciation, gratitude, depth, complexity, bitter-sweetness, emotion, indecision and all the other things that make humans 3-dimensional. Men are flat in this world. They’re just meant to wear suits and expensive watches and go to ‘business meetings’ or go shirtless with six packs, and have a few girls around them, who they sleep with but don’t have particular attachment to. That’s marketing’s view of masculinity.

I find it preposterous that for the longest time men weren’t meant to use certain products. Take moisturizers as an example, as if only women needed moisturizer. Or to groom their eyebrows, as if only women need to interfere with nature. And if you look at cosmetic products today for men, it’s just ridiculous how blue and grey they are and how much effort companies have to go to to make them look boring and ‘manly’ enough to be accepted, and how they always have to be labelled as ‘For men’. Have you ever seen a cosmetic product labelled ‘For women’?

My perusal of Men’s health got me thinking about the other ways in which men are shackled. Some of these are counter-intuitive and I deep-dive into the ones I feel most worthy of editorial exploration:

  • They can’t like anything that’s not black or blue or grey
  • They must have masculine hobbies like watching sports, doing sports. Straight men can’t say they like doing embroidery or going to art galleries 
  • They can’t cry during movies
  • They need to be stronger than women even when they’re sick/tired
  • They can’t say ‘no’ to sex even when they don’t want it
  • They can’t seem to want sex too much
  • They have to pretend that monogamy is normal and that they only want to sleep with their wives/girlfriends
  • They can’t text more than one line at a time, or use punctuation (Ok, I’m not sure why this is, but men consistently are sparse and lack attention to detail in written communication versus women in my experience)

Let’s talk more about the meatiest shackles….

Shackle: Men must have masculine hobbies like watching sports, doing sports. They can’t say they like doing embroidery or going to art galleries

Or doing anything that a girl like me who likes poetry and art might actually be able to relate to!

I have many female friends who I can have endlessly long conversations with that traverse many topics, because many of my female friends share the same interests as me: photography, nature, art, poetry, reading, movies, travelling, observing and philosophizing on social phenomena.

And conversations with men? Honestly, I struggle sometimes. The men that are good conversationalists usually are those that have a broad range of interests, and these men are rare. I’ve come across a higher proportion of guys than girls who have just one or two hobbies that I find unrelatable (like playing pool, or watching football). It makes me wonder: is it that they were raised that way?  Is it that they weren’t encouraged to love whatever caught their interest freely, because certain activities are considered more ‘female’ than others. May be it’s not that they were explicitly told that they couldn’t pursue art, but that our society is still pretty gender-segregated from birth to death and so you tend to do what your social group likes doing.

Are many men who pursue stereo-typically masculine interests truly free?

A friend pointed out, however, that in many ways men to get to still have the best of most fields. For example, even if it is relatively less common to come across men who are into art versus women, many of the world’s most renowned artists are men. Similarly with chefs.

Shackle: Men can’t seem to want sex too much

This is a fairly recent phenomenon that I have observed in future-forward cities like San Francisco. Because it’s so widely known that men want sex, many men have taken upon themselves a new shackle of pretending they don’t want sex that much. It has actually made some aspects of dating even more frustrating for girls.

“It’s been date 5 and he hasn’t even kissed me yet, I just feel like he doesn’t want me” – Anonymous girlfriend

I did go on a Tinder date many months back in San Francisco, and was enthusiastically expecting light-hearted banter and flirting, and was disappointed when the guy outstretched his hand and said ‘Nice to meet you’ upon arrival as if it was a business meeting and then proceeded to ask lots of fact-based questions about my life as if he was actually interested in me as a person. Ughh dude, this isn’t Co-founders lab, it’s Tinder. Also, if you’re an Indian girl, 99.9% of people just automatically assume you are boring and a prude. 0.01% have the imagination to treat you like an individual.

Shackle: Men have to pretend that monogamy is normal and that they only want to sleep with their wives/girlfriends

 “When men cheat, it’s not necessarily because they don’t love the woman. Sometimes, it’s just the thrill of it. When women cheat, it’s because they’re unhappy with the man, because they’re not getting what they need” – wise SF guy friend

The more I’ve seen, experienced and talked to men, and read about these mystical creatures, the more I’ve come to believe that monogamy is not their nature, but a constraint forced on them by society. They can love someone and sleep with someone else, in a way that a higher proportion of women would struggle with.

The shackle of monogamy is a tough one to enforce on many men as it runs so very counter to their instinctive nature. So it takes a lot of cultural reinforcement to keep it in place. We see this in the media and in our society all the time with the glorification of people who make positive statements about their marriage. I’m not necessarily saying it’s a bad thing, I’m just observing with curious ambivalence at this point.

When we had business speeches at Oxford by CxOs, some CxOs would randomly bring in that marrying their wife was the best decision they ever made, and this statement would be met by approval from the audience. Was it really Mr CEO? Is that why you barely spend any time with your token wife?  

“Thursday is date night with my wife” say some, which is met by approving nods from everyone around the table. Even though you know they are bored as hell on date night listening to the same drab conversation, but they have to make it look fun and fulfilling to the outside world, and they have to contribute to maintaining the group norm that monogamy is a desirable state, and that one person can be the most fascinating person in your life for 60-70 years straight.


Concluding thoughts

The interesting aspect of shackles is that they work in several opposing directions. Some shackles bring men and women closer together by pretending that and making us behave as if we are more similar than we actually are. Some shackles bring us further apart by pretending that we are so different and want such different things when we don’t actually. What I hope for is a world with more freedom where people can gravitate to what truly interests them without as much worry about what is ‘masculine’ or ‘feminine’. And selfishly, for men to become more interesting. Please.


Disclaimer/Note: What I write is based on my perspectives, and is highly generalized. It’s also written from a heterosexual perspective. I do not intend to cause offence, nor to assert my views as ‘correct’, but intend to bring up topics to inspire interesting thought and conversations among my readers.